Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Telefónica, SA and Telefónica de España, SA v European Commission (T-336/07)
Judgment
Law
A –Admissibility of the applicants’ ar…
60

Telefónica, SA and Telefónica de España, SA v European Commission (T-336/07)

Judgment of 29 Mar 2012law://eu/cjeu/2007/t-336-07/para_60@2026-11-11

60The annexes cannot therefore be used to develop a plea set out summarily in the application by putting forward complaints or arguments not set out in the application (see Case T-340/03 France Télécom v Commission [2007] ECR II-107, paragraph 167 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Eighth Chamber
Case: T-336/07 · ECLI:EU:T:2012:172
Decided: 29 Mar 2012
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Telefónica, SA; Telefónica de España, SA; represented initially by F. González Díaz and S. Sorinas Jimeno, and subsequently by F. González Díaz, lawyers
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M.E. Martins Ribeiro
Bench: 3 judges
L. Truchot, M.E. Martins Ribeiro, H. Kanninen
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62007TJ0336

Topics

Dominant position

History · 1 version

29 Mar 2012Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21); Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission (T-334/19); Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-671/19); Bulgarian Energy Holding EAD and Others v European Commission (T-136/19); Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v European Parliament (T-272/21)2 provisions; Wieland-Werke AG v European Commission (T-251/19); Canon Inc. v European Commission (T-609/19); Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission (T-334/17); SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-324/17); Latam Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA v European Commission (T-344/17); Air Canada v European Commission (T-326/17); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (T-325/17); Google LLC, formerly Google Inc. and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-612/17)2 provisions; Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro AE v European Commission (T-191/16); Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission (T-814/17); International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) v Council of the European Union (T-251/18); Campine NV and Campine Recycling NV v European Commission (T-240/17); Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission (T-851/14); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-827/14); Europa Terra Nostra e.V. v European Parliament (T-13/17); Orange Polska S.A., formerly Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. v European Commission (T-486/11)2 provisions; Al-Bashir Mohammed Al-Faqih and Others v European Commission (T-134/11)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); The Queen, on the application of Vodafone Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (C-58/08); Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-475/01); The Queen, on the application of International Air Transport Association and European Low Fares Airline Association v Department for Transport (C-344/04); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-339/04); Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v European Commission (T-66/01); Honeywell International, Inc. v Commission of the European Communities (T-209/01); EDP - Energias de Portugal, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-87/05); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94); Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-191/98, T-212/98, T-213/98, T-214/98); Commission of the European Communities v Tetra Laval BV (C-12/03 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); United Brands Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission of the European Communities (27/76); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81)