28Agrover submits that it ought to have obtained exemption from payment under Article 220(2) (b) of the Customs Code on the basis of errors attributable to the customs authorities. It complains that the latter issued an EUR.1 certificate and gave differing interpretations of Article 216 of that code. Agrover maintains that it always acted in good faith and provided those authorities with all the information required to obtain an exemption from import duties. It claims that the fact that the customs authorities did not contest those imports constitutes an error such as to prevent the subsequent entry of the duties in the accounts, relying in that respect on Case C-250/91 Hewlett Packard France [1993] ECR I-1819.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.