Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Rhiannon Morgan v Bezirksregierung Köln and Iris Bucher v Landrat des Kreises Düren (C-11/06, C-12/06)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
The second question in Case C-12/06
53

Rhiannon Morgan v Bezirksregierung Köln and Iris Bucher v Landrat des Kreises Düren (C-11/06, C-12/06)

Judgment of 23 Oct 2007law://eu/cjeu/2006/c-11-06/para_53@2026-11-11

53In those circumstances, since that question has been answered in the affirmative, there is no need here to reply to the second question referred in Case C-12/06.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Cases: C-11/06, C-12/06 · ECLI:EU:C:2007:626
Decided: 23 Oct 2007
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicants: Rhiannon Morgan; Iris Bucher
Defendants: Bezirksregierung Köln; Landrat des Kreises Düren
Rapporteur: A. Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Bench: 12 judges
V. Skouris, P. Jann, A. Rosas, K. Lenaerts, G. Arestis, U. Lõhmus, P. Kūris, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, J. Malenovský, J. Klučka, A. Ó Caoimh
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62006CJ0011

Topics

Right of entry and residence

History · 1 version

23 Oct 2007Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions
Cited by 16: Ministerul Administraţiei şi Internelor - Direcţia Generală de Paşapoarte Bucureşti v Gheorghe Jipa (C-33/07); Hans-Dieter Jundt and Hedwig Jundt v Finanzamt Offenburg (C-281/06)2 provisions; Jakub Cupriak-Trojan and Mateusz Trojan v Wojewoda Mazowiecki (C-713/23); Relu Adrian Coman and Others v Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări and Ministerul Afacerilor Interne (C-673/16); K. M. H. v Obshtina Stara Zagora (C-43/24); E.P. v Ministarstvo financija Republike Hrvatske, Samostalni sektor za drugostupanjski upravni postupak (C-277/23); B. Martens v Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap (C-359/13); Andreas Ingemar Thiele Meneses v Region Hannover (C-220/12)2 provisions; Samantha Elrick v Bezirksregierung Köln (C-275/12)2 provisions; Laurence Prinz v Region Hannover (C‑523/11) and Philipp Seeberger v Studentenwerk Heidelberg (C‑585/11) (C-523/11, C-585/11)2 provisions; Elodie Giersch and Others v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (C-20/12)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-269/09)2 provisions; European Commission v Republic of Hungary (C-253/09)2 provisions; Nicolas Bressol and Others and Céline Chaverot and Others v Gouvernement de la Communauté française (C-73/08)2 provisions; Petra von Chamier-Glisczinski v Deutsche Angestellten-Krankenkasse (C-208/07); this act
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; The Queen, on the application of Dany Bidar v London Borough of Ealing and Secretary of State for Education and Skills (C-209/03); Gérald De Cuyper v Office national de l'emploi (C-406/04); Heikki Antero Pusa v Osuuspankkien Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö (C-224/02); Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-147/03); Herbert Schwarz and Marga Gootjes-Schwarz v Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach (C-76/05); C.P.M. Meeusen v Hoofddirectie van de Informatie Beheer Groep (C-337/97); Karl Robert Kranemann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-109/04); K. Tas-Hagen and R. A. Tas v Raadskamer WUBO van de Pensioen- en Uitkeringsraad (C-192/05); Carmina di Leo v Land Berlin (C-308/89); Marie-Nathalie D'Hoop v Office national de l'emploi (C-224/98); this act