Gérard Meric v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-133/05)

Judgment of 7 Sept 2006

law://eu/cjeu/2005/t-133-05/para_29@2026-11-13

29In addition, the goods can be considered as identical when the goods designated by the earlier mark are included in a more general category, designated by the trade mark application (Case T-388/00 Institut für Lernsysteme v OHIM — Educational Services (ELS) [2002] ECR II-4301, paragraph 53) or when the goods designated by the trade mark application are included in a more general category designated by the earlier mark (Case T-104/01 Oberhauser v OHIM — Petit Liberto (Fifties) [2002] ECR II-4359, paragraphs 32 and 33; Case T-110/01 Vedial v OHIM - France Distribution (HUBERT) [2002] ECR II-5275, paragraphs 43 and 44; and Case T-10/03 Koubi v OHIM — Flabesa (CONFORFLEX) [2004] ECR II-719, paragraphs 41 and 42).

Gérard Meric v Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-133/05)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version