Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
BASF AG and UCB SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-101/05, T-111/05)
Judgment
Law
3.Second plea raised by BASF: breach o…
Findings of the Court
64

BASF AG and UCB SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-101/05, T-111/05)

Judgment of 12 Dec 2007law://eu/cjeu/2005/t-101-05/para_64@2026-11-10

64The Court rejects at the outset BASF's argument that a case of repeated infringement can be recognised only where the infringements relate to the same product market. It is sufficient that the Commission is dealing with infringements falling under the same provision of the EC Treaty.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Cases: T-101/05, T-111/05 · ECLI:EU:T:2007:380
Decided: 12 Dec 2007
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: BASF AG; UCB SA
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Papasavvas
Bench: 3 judges
A.W.H. Meij, N.J. Forwood, S. Papasavvas
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005TJ0101

Topics

History · 1 version

12 Dec 2007Reading

Connections

Cited by 19: Crédit agricole SA and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Commission (T-113/17); JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Others v European Commission (T-106/17); Clariant AG and Clariant International AG v European Commission (T-590/20)2 provisions; SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-324/17)2 provisions; Scania AB and Others v European Commission (T-799/17); HSBC Holdings plc and Others v European Commission (T-105/17); Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (T-691/14); Silec Cable and General Cable Corp. v European Commission (T-438/14); Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14); Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA and Others v European Commission (T-426/10); Samsung SDI Co. Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-84/13); Fapricela - Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (T-398/10)2 provisions; Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM) and Ori Martin SA v European Commission (T-389/10, T-419/10)2 provisions; FSL Holdings and Others v European Commission (T-655/11)2 provisions; Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v European Commission (T-456/10)2 provisions; LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission (C-227/14 P); Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-72/09); Hansen & Rosenthal KG and H&R Wax Company Vertrieb GmbH v European Commission (T-544/08); Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission (T-90/10)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Commission of the European Communities v SGL Carbon AG (C-301/04); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-407/04 P); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-50/00); NV Koninklijke KNP BT v Commission of the European Communities (C-248/98 P); Ventouris Group Enterprises SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-59/99); Archer Daniels Midland Company and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-224/00); Groupe Danone v Commission of the European Communities (T-38/02); General Electric Company v Commission of the European Communities (T-210/01); Solvay SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-30/91); Regulation (EEC) No 2988/74 of the Council of 26 November 1974 concerning limitation periods in proceedings and the enforcement of sanctions under the rules of the European Economic Community relating to transport and competition; Groupe Danone v Commission of the European Communities (C-3/06 P); Cimenteries CBR and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95, T-31/95, T-32/95, T-34/95, T-35/95, T-36/95, T-37/95, T-38/95, T-39/95, T-42/95, T-43/95, T-44/95, T-45/95, T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95, T-51/95, T-52/95, T-53/95, T-54/95, T-55/95, T-56/95, T-57/95, T-58/95, T-59/95, T-60/95, T-61/95, T-62/95, T-63/95, T-64/95, T-65/95, T-68/95, T-69/95, T-70/95, T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95, T-103/95, T-104/95); Commission of the European Communities v Anic Partecipazioni SpA (C-49/92 P); JFE Engineering Corp., formerly NKK Corp., Nippon Steel Corp., JFE Steel Corp. and Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-67/00, T-68/00, T-71/00, T-78/00); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Brasserie nationale SA (anc. Brasseries Funck-Bricher et Bofferding), Brasserie Jules Simon et Cie SCS and Brasserie Battin SNC v Commission of the European Communities (T-49/02, T-50/02, T-51/02); HFB Holding für Fernwärmetechnik Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-9/99); BASF AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-15/02); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P)