Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Common Market Fertilizers SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-443/05 P)
Judgment
Appeal
Alleged misapplication of Article 239…
Arguments of the parties
—Appellants arguments
157

Common Market Fertilizers SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-443/05 P)

Judgment of 13 Sept 2007law://eu/cjeu/2005/c-443-05/para_157@2026-11-11

157CMF submits that the professional liability of customs agents has been recognised in Community law (Joined Cases 98/83 and 230/83 Van Gend & Loos and Expeditiebedrijf Wim Bosman v Commission [1984] ECR 3763, paragraph 16).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-443/05 P · ECLI:EU:C:2007:511
Decided: 13 Sept 2007
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Common Market Fertilizers SA
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: L. Bay Larsen
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 4 judges
J. Klucka, J. Makarczyk, G. Arestis, L. Bay Larsen
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005CJ0443

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Sept 2007Reading

Connections

Cited by 19: YP v European Commission (T-581/20); Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA v European Commission (T-645/18); Deza, a.s. v European Commission (T-638/18); Industrial Química del Nalón, SA v European Commission (T-635/18); Tokai erftcarbon GmbH v European Commission (T-636/18); SGL Carbon SE v European Commission (T-639/18); Bawtry Carbon International Ltd v European Commission (T-637/18); Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v European Commission (C-352/19 P); Tilly-Sabco v European Commission (T-437/18); Tilly-Sabco v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-707/18); Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (T-630/15); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-466/14); Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion v European Commission (T-320/09); Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG v European Commission (C-7/14); Wünsche Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co KG v European Commission (T-147/12); Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament (T-346/11, T-347/11)2 provisions; Vischim Srl v Commission of the European Communities (T-420/05); Thomson Sales Europe v Commission of the European Communities (T-225/07); Heuschen & Schrouff Oriëntal Foods Trading BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-38/07)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code; Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code; 1999/468/EC: Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission; Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities (C-69/89); Common Market Fertilizers SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-134/03, T-135/03); Commission of the European Communities v BASF AG, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Hüls AG, Elf Atochem SA, Société Artésienne de Vinyle SA, Wacker Chemie GmbH, Enichem SpA, Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd and Montedison SpA (C-137/92 P); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-263/95); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (C-156/00); Firma Söhl & Söhlke v Hauptzollamt Bremen (C-48/98); Peter Biegi Nahrungsmittel GmbH and Commonfood Handelsgesellschaft für Agrar-Produkte mbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-499/03 P); Van Gend & Loos NV and Expeditiebedrijf Wim Bosman BV v Commission of the European Communities (98/83, 230/83); G. van den Berg v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-164/01 P); Société française de transports Gondrand Frères SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-104/02); Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-122/04); Council Regulation (EC) No 3319/94 of 22 December 1994 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of urea ammonium nitrate solution originating in Bulgaria and Poland, exported by companies not exempted from the duty, and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed