Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
easyJet Airline Co. Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-177/04)
Judgment
Admissibility
2. Findings of the Court
Standing to bring proceedings
31

easyJet Airline Co. Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-177/04)

law://eu/cjeu/2004/t-177-04/para_31@2026-11-14

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-177/04 · ECLI:EU:T:2006:187
Decided: 4 Jul 2006
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Papasavvas
Bench: 3 judges
J. Pirrung, N.J. Forwood, S. Papasavvas
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004TJ0177

Topics

Concentrations between undertakings Dominant position

History · 1 version

4 Jul 2006Reading

Judgment of 4 Jul 2006

31The applicant is not a party to the merger in this case and is not therefore a person to whom the contested decision is addressed. It is thus necessary to consider whether it is directly and individually concerned by the decision.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 21: enercity AG v European Commission (C-485/23 P)3 provisions; Mainova AG v European Commission (C-484/23 P)3 provisions; Uniper Global Commodities SE v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-96/23); RWE Supply & Trading GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-95/23); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-64/20); NetCologne Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation mbH v European Commission (T-58/20); Iliad Italia SpA v European Commission (T-692/20); Tele Columbus AG v European Commission (T-69/20); TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission (T-56/21); Naturstrom AG v European Commission (T-60/21); enercity AG v European Commission (T-65/21); Mainova AG v European Commission (T-64/21); Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission (T-55/21); GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (T-62/21); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-53/21); Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission (T-58/21); eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-59/21); EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission (T-61/21); Polwax S.A. v European Commission (T-585/20); GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (T-319/20); TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission (T-315/20)
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Ivan Torre and Others v European Commission (T-159/98); Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Commission of the European Communities (T-2/03); EDP - Energias de Portugal, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-87/05); French Government v Commission of the European Communities (C-15/76, C-16/76); Commission of the European Communities v Tetra Laval BV (C-12/03 P); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (25/62); Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Company Inc. v Commission of the European Communities (6/72); Antillean Rice Mills NV, Trading & Shipping Co. Ter Beek BV, European Rice Brokers AVV, Alesie Curaçao NV and Guyana Investments AVV v Commission of the European Communities (T-480/93, T-483/93); Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93; Arbeitsgemeinschaft der öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (ARD) v Commission of the European Communities (T-158/00); French Republic and Société commerciale des potasses et de l'azote (SCPA) and Entreprise minière et chimique (EMC) v Commission of the European Communities (C-68/94, C-30/95); Compagnie française de l'azote (Cofaz) SA and others v Commission of the European Communities (169/84); BaByliss SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-114/02); Comité d'entreprise de la Société française de production, Syndicat national de radiodiffusion et de télévision CGT (SNRT-CGT), Syndicat unifié de radio et de télévision CFDT (SURT-CFDT), Syndicat national Force ouvrière de radiodiffusion et de télévision and Syndicat national de l'encadrement audiovisuel CFE-CGC (SNEA-CFE-CGC) v Commission of the European Communities (C-106/98 P); Société Anonyme à Participation Ouvrière Compagnie Nationale Air France v Commission of the European Communities (T-3/93); International Express Carriers Conference (IECC) v Commission of the European Communities, La Poste, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and The Post Office (C-449/98 P); Royal Philips Electronics NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-119/02); Association of Sorbitol Producers within the EC (ASPEC), Cerestar Holding BV, Roquette Frères SA and Merck oHG v Commission of the European Communities (T-435/93); Henk Altmann and Margaret Casson v Commission of the European Communities (T-177/94, T-377/94); Nederlandse Bankiersvereniging and Nederlandse Vereniging van Banken v Commission of the European Communities (T-138/89); AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-62/86); Paul de Hoe v Commission of the European Communities (T-85/92); Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings