Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Segi, Araitz Zubimendi Izaga and Aritza Galarraga v Council of the European Union (C-355/04 P)
Judgment
Concerning the appeal
Substance
Findings of the Court
—The ground of appeal alleging disrega…
46

Segi, Araitz Zubimendi Izaga and Aritza Galarraga v Council of the European Union (C-355/04 P)

Judgment of 27 Feb 2007law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-355-04/para_46@2026-11-11

46In contrast, Article 35 EU confers no jurisdiction on the Court of Justice to entertain any action for damages whatsoever.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-355/04 P · ECLI:EU:C:2007:116
Decided: 27 Feb 2007
Procedure: Appeal
Applicants: Segi; Araitz Zubimendi Izaga; Aritza Galarraga
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: J.-C. Bonichot
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, K. Lenaerts, R. Schintgen, A. Tizzano, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, R. Silva de Lapuerta, L. Bay Larsen, P. Lindh, J.-C. Bonichot, T. von Danwitz
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0355

Topics

Common foreign and security policy Justice and home affairs Non-contractual liability

History · 1 version

27 Feb 2007Reading

Connections

Cited by 9: PJSC Rosneft Oil Company v Her Majesty's Treasury and Others (C-72/15); Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW v Leden van de Ministerraad (C-303/05)2 provisions; Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union (C-134/19 P)2 provisions; H v Council of the European Union and Others (C-455/14 P); Aguy Clement Georgias and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-168/12)2 provisions; Wolfgang Mandt v European Parliament (F-45/07); Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-49/05); Maria-Luise Lindorfer v Council of the European Union (C-227/04 P); Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-47/03)
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; French Republic v Monsanto Company and Commission of the European Communities (C-248/99 P); The Queen v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Gustaff Desiderius Antonissen (C-292/89); Segi and Others v Council of the European Union (T-338/02); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-57/95); Administrative proceedings brought by VAG Sverige AB (C-329/95); Council Decision 2003/48/JHA of 19 December 2002 on the implementation of specific measures for police and judicial cooperation to combat terrorism in accordance with Article 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP; Kingdom of Spain v Eurojust (C-160/03); European Commission v Augusto Brazzelli Lualdi (C-136/92 P); Heidelberger Bauchemie GmbH (C-49/02); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities (22/70); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P); Criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino (C-105/03)