Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-209/04)
Judgment
Legal framework
The Birds Directive
6

Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-209/04)

Judgment of 23 Mar 2006law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-209-04/para_6@2026-11-11

6The corncrake (Crex crex) is a species added to Annex I to the Birds Directive (‘Annex I’) by Commission Directive 85/411/EEC of 25 July 1985 amending Directive 79/409 (OJ 1985 L 233, p. 33).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-209/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2006:195
Decided: 23 Mar 2006
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendant: Republic of Austria
Rapporteur: P. Kūris
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, R. Schintgen, P. Kūris, G. Arestis, J. Klučka
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0209

Topics

History · 1 version

23 Mar 2006Reading

Connections

Cited by 5: Jozef Križan and Others v Slovenská inšpekcia životného prostredia (C-416/10)2 provisions; Città Metropolitana di Bari, formerly Provincia di Bari v Edilizia Mastrodonato Srl (C-147/15); European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria (C-141/14); European Commission v Republic of Lithuania (C-350/08)2 provisions; Stadt Papenburg v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-226/08)
Cites 9: Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-431/92); Burgemeester en wethouders van Haarlemmerliede en Spaarnwoude and Others v Gedeputeerde Staten van Noord-Holland (C-81/96); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-166/97); Commission Directive 85/411/EEC of 25 July 1985 amending Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds; Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora; Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-3/96); Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds; Regina v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (C-44/95); Gerald Weidacher (as administrator of the insolvent company Thakis Vertriebs- und Handels GmbH) v Bundesminister für Land- und Forstwirtschaft (C-179/00)