Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-351/03)
Judgment
Substance
The other instances of unlawful conduc…
Breach of Schneiders right to be heard…
—Findings of the Court
185

Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-351/03)

Judgment of 11 Jul 2007law://eu/cjeu/2003/t-351-03/para_185@2026-11-12

185Moreover, there is no rule of law or principle which prevents the Commission from entrusting to the same officials re-examination of a concentration in compliance with a judgment annulling a decision declaring that concentration to be incompatible with the common market.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-351/03 · ECLI:EU:T:2007:212
Decided: 11 Jul 2007
Procedure: Action for damages
Applicant: Schneider Electric SA
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Legal
Bench: 4 judges
H. Legal (President), V. Vadapalas, E. Moavero Milanesi, N. Wahl
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62003TJ0351

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Non-contractual liability

History · 1 version

11 Jul 2007Reading

Connections

Interpreted by the courts in 1: Commission of the European Communities v Schneider Electric SA (C-440/07)
Cited by 22: Banca Popolare di Bari SpA v European Commission (T-415/21); Società Navigazione Siciliana SCpA v European Commission (T-666/21); PB v European Commission (T-775/20); HB v European Commission (T-408/21); ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission (T-540/18); United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission (T-834/17); Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union (T-406/15); Bank Saderat plc v Council of the European Union (T-433/15); Bank Tejarat v Council of the European Union (T-37/17); Export Development Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union (T-553/15); Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council of the European Union (T-434/15); East West Consulting SPRL v European Commission (T-298/16); Post Bank Iran v Council of the European Union (T-559/15); Iran Insurance Company v Council of the European Union (T-558/15); HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping GmbH v Council of the European Union (T-692/15); Antrax It Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-828/14, T-829/14)2 provisions; Mahmoud Jannatian v Council of the European Union (T-328/14); Claire Staelen v European Ombudsman (T-217/11)2 provisions; Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (T-384/11)2 provisions; Marta Andreasen v European Commission (T-17/08); Artegodan GmbH v European Commission (T-429/05); Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-341/07)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission (C-257/98 P); Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings; Manel Camós Grau v European Commission (T-309/03); Koinopraxia Enóséon Georgikon Synetairismon Diacheiríséos Enchorion Proïonton Syn. PE (KYDEP) v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-146/91); Förde-Reederei GmbH v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-170/00); Holcim (Deutschland) AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-282/05 P); Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-310/01); J. M. Mulder and others and Otto Heinemann v Council of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities (C-104/89, C-37/90); Transocean Marine Paint Association v Commission of the European Communities (17/74); General Electric Company v Commission of the European Communities (T-210/01); SA Oleifici Mediterranei v European Economic Community (26/81); Alfredo Grifoni v European Atomic Energy Community (C-308/87); Fresh Marine Company SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-178/98); Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-48/03); British Airways plc v Commission of the European Communities (T-219/99); Commission of the European Communities v Fresh Marine Company A/S (C-472/00 P); British Airways plc v Commission of the European Communities (C-95/04 P); Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-383/00); Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-188/06); Établissements Biret et Cie SA v Council of the European Union (C-94/02 P); Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte (C-269/90)