58In its observations on the statements in intervention and at the hearing, the applicant relies on the judgment in Case T-5/02 Tetra Laval v Commission [2002] ECR II-4381 as authority that proof of conglomerate effects calls for a precise examination, supported by convincing evidence, that particular care must be taken when taking future conduct into account and that the Commission's analysis must be particularly plausible with regard to effects that will emerge after a certain lapse of time. It also stated that, according to that judgment, the Commission must take into account the deterrent effect for an undertaking of the prohibition on abuse of a dominant position set out in Article 82 EC.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.