142The defendant states, first, that it follows from a consistent line of decisions that the annulment of a measure of the administration may constitute, in itself, compensation that is appropriate and, in principle, sufficient for any nonmaterial harm which the applicant official may have sustained, in particular if the measure did not involve an injurious assessment with respect to the applicant (see, in that regard, Case T-60/94 Vierrat v Court of Justice [1995] ECRSC I-A-23 and II-77, paragraph 62, and Joined Cases T-282/97 and T-57/98 Giannini v Commission [1999] ECRSC I-A-33 and II-151, paragraph 40). According to the defendant, the contested decision did not involve any negative assessment of the applicant himself and, furthermore, was not capable of containing such an assessment, since the appointing authority was required to take note of the subjective assessment of the EDD Group in relation to the applicant and his health.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.