84In paragraphs 88 to 90 of that John Deere judgment, the Court confirmed the general premiss on which the Court of First Instance based its reasoning, namely that:— in principle, where there is a truly competitive market, transparency between traders is likely to lead to intensification of competition between suppliers, since the fact that in such a situation a trader takes into account information on the operation of the market, made available to him under the information exchange system, in order to adjust his conduct on the market, is not likely, having regard to the atomised nature of the supply, to reduce or remove for the other traders all uncertainty about the foreseeable nature of his competitors' conduct;— however, on a highly concentrated oligopolistic market, the exchange of market information is liable to enable undertakings to be aware of the market positions and strategies of their competitors and thus to impair appreciably the competition which exists between traders.