71The Parliament considers therefore that neither in the telephone conversation of 4 December 1995 nor during the visit of 13 December 1995 can a fault be identified on its part such as to give the applicant a right to damages. That conclusion may be drawn from the case-law of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance (see Joined Cases 19/69, 20/69, 25/69 and 30/69 Richez-Parise and Others v Commission [1970] ECR 325, paragraphs 36 to 41, Case 137/79Kohll v Commission [1980] ECR 2601, paragraphs 12 to 15, and Case T-133/89Burban v Parliament [1990] ECR II-245, paragraph 36, confirmed by Case C-255/90 PBúrban v Parliament [1992] ECR I-2253, paragraphs 10 to 12).