Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) (C-286/95 P)
Judgment
The second plea
38

Commission of the European Communities v Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) (C-286/95 P)

Judgment of 6 Apr 2000law://eu/cjeu/1995/c-286-95/para_38@2026-11-11

38It should be remembered that, since the intellectual component and the formal component form an inseparable whole, reducing the act to writing is the necessary expression of the intention of the adopting authority (Commission v BASF and Others, paragraph 70).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-286/95 P · ECLI:EU:C:2000:188
Decided: 6 Apr 2000
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendant: Imperial Chemical Industries pic (ICI)
Rapporteur: Sevón
Advocate General: N. Fennelly
Bench: 4 judges
P.J.G. Kapteyn, P. Jann, H. Ragnemalm, M. Wathelet
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61995CJ0286

Topics

Dominant position

History · 1 version

6 Apr 2000Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: QN v European Commission (T-531/21); Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation v European Commission (C-759/21); Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (C-757/21); Council of the European Union v Hamas (C-833/19 P); European Commission v Landesbank Baden-Württemberg and Single Resolution Board (C-584/20 P); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-699/17); Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board (T-420/17); Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v Single Resolution Board (T-411/17)2 provisions; Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG, formerly Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-414/17); Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG, foremerly Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-377/16, T-645/16, T-809/16)2 provisions; Banco Cooperativo Español, SA v Single Resolution Board (T-323/16)2 provisions; Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board (T-365/16)2 provisions; Hamas v Council of the European Union (T-308/18); Gamaa Islamya Égypte v Council of the European Union (T-643/16); Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo sp. z o.o. v European Commission (T-263/15); Goldfish BV and Others v European Commission (T-54/14); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-263/13 P); FSL Holdings and Others v European Commission (T-655/11)2 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-429/13 P); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-192/13 P)
Cites 3: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Commission of the European Communities v BASF AG, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Hüls AG, Elf Atochem SA, Société Artésienne de Vinyle SA, Wacker Chemie GmbH, Enichem SpA, Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd and Montedison SpA (C-137/92 P); Imperial Chemical Industries plc v Commission of the European Communities (T-37/91)