Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P)
Judgment
The pleas alleging procedural irregula…
Breach of the principles applicable in…
71

Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P)

Judgment of 17 Dec 1998law://eu/cjeu/1995/c-185-95/para_71@2026-11-11

71Pursuant to Article 48(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, the parties may offer further evidence in support of their arguments in reply or rejoinder. They must give reasons for the delay in offering it.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-185/95 P · ECLI:EU:C:1998:608
Decided: 17 Dec 1998
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 61989TJ0145
Applicant: Baustahlgewebe GmbH
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: H. Ragnemalm
Advocate General: P. Léger
Bench: 10 judges
J.-P. Puissochet, G. Hirsch (Presidents of Chambers), G. E Mancini, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, D. A. O. Edward, H. Ragnemalm, L. Sevón, M. Wathelet, R. Schintgen, K. M. Ioannou
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61995CJ0185

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

17 Dec 1998Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-145/89)
Cited by 23: Lara Comi v European Parliament (T-422/23); AQ v European Chemicals Agency (T-1101/23); UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21); PGI Spain, SL and Others v European Commission (T-596/22); UniCredit Bank GmbH, anciennement UniCredit Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-405/22); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-407/22); Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Commission (T-386/21); Penya Barça Lyon : Plus que des supporters (PBL) and Issam Abdelmouine v European Commission (C-224/23 P); ACMO Sàrl and Others v Single Resolution Board (T-330/20); PB v Single Resolution Board (T-293/22); AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK 'Azot' v European Commission (T-126/21)2 provisions; PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank (T-230/20); Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-604/18)2 provisions; WT v European Commission (T-91/20); United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission (T-834/17); Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission (T-616/18); HB v European Investment Bank (T-689/20); Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios (OCU) v European Central Bank (T-15/18); HeidelbergCement AG and Schwenk Zement KG v European Commission (T-380/17); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-46/19); Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission (C-606/18 P); AL v European Commission (T-83/19); CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v European Commission (T-399/16)
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission of the European Communities (85/76); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Opinion pursuant to Article 228 of the EC Treaty (Opinion 2/94); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Raimund Vidrányi v European Commission (C-283/90 P); Friedrich Kremzow v Republik Österreich (C-299/95); San Marco Impex Italiana Srl v Commission of the European Communities (C-19/95); Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-219/95 P); European Commission v V (C-188/96 P); BPB Industries plc and British Gypsum Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-310/93 P); Somaco SARL v Commission of the European Communities (C-401/96 P); Hilti AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-53/92 P); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-145/89); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81)