Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-25/94)
Judgment
Admissibility
25

Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-25/94)

Judgment of 19 Mar 1996law://eu/cjeu/1994/c-25-94/para_25@2026-11-12

25Article 151(1), which forms part of the section relating to the Council, provides that Coreper is responsible for preparing the work of the Council and for carrying out the tasks assigned to it by the Council.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-25/94 · ECLI:EU:C:1996:114
Decided: 19 Mar 1996
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: F. A. Schockweiler
Advocate General: F. G. Jacobs
Bench: 10 judges
J.-P. Puissochet, G. Hirsch (Presidents of Chambers), G. F. Mancini, F. A. Schockweiler, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, P. J. G. Kapteyn, C. Gulmann, J. L. Murray, H. Ragnemalm, L. Sevón
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61994CJ0025

Topics

Fisheries Law governing the institutions

History · 1 version

19 Mar 1996Reading

Connections

Cited by 6: European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-626/15, C-659/16)2 provisions; Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-333/09); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-236/07)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden (C-246/07)2 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (T-369/05); Area Cova, SA and Others v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-196/99)2 provisions
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Commission (Opinion 2/91); The Queen v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Gustaff Desiderius Antonissen (C-292/89); Etablissements Armand Mondiet SA v Armement Islais SARL (C-405/92); Cornelis Kramer and others (C-3/76, C-4/76, C-6/76); Ruling delivered pursuant to the third paragraph of Article 103 of the EAEC Treaty - Draft Convention of the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials, Facilities and Transports (C-1/78); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Communities (22/70); Commission (Opinion 1/94)