Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Federal Republic of Germany v Council of the European Union (C-280/93)
Judgment
Breach of substantive rules of Communi…
Breach of the principle of undistorted…
61

Federal Republic of Germany v Council of the European Union (C-280/93)

Judgment of 5 Oct 1994law://eu/cjeu/1993/c-280-93/para_61@2026-11-12

61Recognition is thus given to both the priority of the agricultural policy over the objectives of the Treaty in the field of competition and the power of the Council to decide to what extent the competition nales are to be applied in the agricultural sector.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-280/93 · ECLI:EU:C:1994:367
Decided: 5 Oct 1994
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: Schockweiler
Advocate General: C. Gulmann
Bench: 10 judges
G. F. Mancini, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida, M. Diez de Velasco, D. A. O. Edward (Presidents of Chambers), C. N. Kakouris, R. Joliet, G. C. Rodríguez Iglesias, M. Zuleeg, P. J. G. Kapteyn, J. L. Murray
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 61993CJ0280

Topics

Common commercial policy Common organisation of the markets

History · 1 version

5 Oct 1994Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Azienda Agro-Zootecnica Franchini sarl and Eolica di Altamura Srl v Regione Puglia (C-2/10)2 provisions; European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) v European Commission (C-928/19 P); Republic of Slovenia v European Commission (T-626/17); European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission (T-310/18); Fruits de Ponent, SCCL v European Commission (T-290/16); Président de l’Autorité de la concurrence v Association des producteurs vendeurs d’endives (APVE) and Others (C-671/15)2 provisions; Slovak Republic and Hungary v Council of the European Union (C-643/15, C-647/15); Proceedings brought by Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (RPO) (C-390/15); Council of the European Union and European Commission v Stichting Natuur en Milieu and Pesticide Action Network Europe (C-404/12 P, C-405/12 P); Council of the European Union and Others v Vereniging Milieudefensie and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht (C-401/12 P, C-402/12 P, C-403/12 P); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-481/11)2 provisions; Du Pont de Nemours (France) SAS and Others v European Commission (T-31/07); Association Kokopelli v Graines Baumaux SAS (C-59/11)2 provisions; Interseroh Scrap and Metals Trading GmbH v Sonderabfall-Management-Gesellschaft Rheinland-Pfalz mbH (SAM) (C-1/11)2 provisions; Nycomed Danmark ApS v European Medicines Agency (EMA) (T-52/09); General Technic-Otis Sàrl, General Technic Sàrl, Otis SA and Others and United Technologies Corporation v European Commission (T-141/07, T-142/07, T-145/07, T-146/07); Kone Oyj, Kone GmbH and Kone BV v European Commission (T-151/07); Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-138/07); ThyssenKrupp Liften Ascenseurs NV and Others v European Commission (T-144/07); CSL Behring GmbH v European Commission and European Medicines Agency (EMA) (T-264/07)
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)12 provisions; The Queen v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State for Health, ex parte: Fedesa and others (C-331/88); International Fruit Company NV and others v Produktschap voor Groenten en Fruit (C-21/72, C-22/72, C-23/72, C-24/72); Hermann Schräder HS Kraftfutter GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Gronau (265/87); Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities (C-69/89); Commission of the European Communities v BASF AG, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Hüls AG, Elf Atochem SA, Société Artésienne de Vinyle SA, Wacker Chemie GmbH, Enichem SpA, Hoechst AG, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd and Montedison SpA (C-137/92 P); Fédération de l'industrie de l'huilerie de la CEE (Fediol) v Commission of the European Communities (70/87); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Communities (68/86); Carl Schlüter v Hauptzollamt Lörrach (9/73); Gustave Wuidart and others v Laiterie coopérative eupenoise société coopérative and others (C-267/88, C-268/88, C-269/88, C-270/88, C-271/88, C-272/88, C-273/88, C-274/88, C-275/88, C-276/88, C-277/88, C-278/88, C-279/88, C-280/88, C-281/88, C-282/88, C-283/88, C-284/88, C-285/88); Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization of the market in bananas; Società Italiana per l'Oleodotto Transalpino (SIOT) v Ministero delle finanze, Ministero della marina mercantile, Circoscrizione doganale di Trieste and Ente autonomo del porto di Trieste (266/81); Offene Handelsgesellschaft in Firma Werner Faust v Commission of the European Communities (52/81); Hubert Wachauf v Bundesamt für Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft (5/88)