6.In the sixth place, the plaintiff in the main proceedings seeks to refute the argument of the Danish Government that the tax in question constituted a stage in the implementation of a general economic plan in which all sectors of society, including farmers, were invited to participate.In that connection, the lack of powers by which the decision of the Danish Government is vitiated is not in any way remedied by that fact, as is shown by previous decisions of the Court of Justice (Case 51/74 Van der Hulst's Zonen v Produktscbap voor Siergewassen [1975] ECR 79; Case 120/78 REWE Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein [1979] ECR 649).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.