Article 2, Point (32) · Regulation (EU) 2024/897

Contents

(32)Articles 49 to 52 are replaced by the following:‘Article 49Recording of caging operations by control cameras and caging declaration1.Farm Member States shall ensure that caging operations shall be monitored by their control authorities using both conventional and stereoscopic cameras. Video records shall be produced for each caging operation in accordance with the minimum standards for video recording procedures set out in Annex X.2.If the quality of the control camera video recording used to determine the number and weight of the bluefin tuna individuals caged does not comply with the minimum standards for video recording procedures set out in Annex X, the competent authority of the farm Member State shall order a control caging until the determination of the number and weight of the bluefin tuna individuals is possible. The repetition of the caging operation shall not be subject to a new caging authorisation.3.In case of a control caging, the competent authority of the farm Member State shall ensure that the donor farm cage is sealed and that the cage cannot be manipulated prior to the new caging operation. The receiving farm cages used in the control caging shall be empty.4.On completion of the caging operation, the competent authority of the farm Member State shall ensure that the ICCAT regional observer has immediate access to all control camera video records and is allowed to make a copy where needed to complete the task of analysing those video records at another time or place.5.Farm Member States shall ensure that, for each caging operation, the farm operator submits an ICCAT declaration on caging within 1 week after the actual caging operation has taken place, using the template set out in Annex XIV.Article 50Launching and conduct of investigations1.Where, for a single catching operation, there is a difference greater than 10 % between the number of the bluefin tuna individuals being caged as communicated by the competent authority of the farm Member State in accordance with Article 51(3), from the number reported in the eBCD or ITD as caught and/or transferred, the competent authority of the catching flag or trap Member State shall launch an investigation to determine the accurate catch weight to be deducted from the national bluefin tuna quota.2.In support of the investigation referred to in the paragraph 1 the competent authority of the catching flag or trap Member State shall request all the complementary information and the results of the relevant video record analysis conducted by the competent authorities of the flag and farm Member State that have been involved in the transport and the caging operation concerned.3.The competent authorities of the Member States, including the flag Member States of the vessels that have been involved in the transport of the fish, shall cooperate actively, including through the exchange of all information and documentation at their disposal.4.The competent authority of the catching flag or trap Member State shall conclude the investigation within 1 month from the communication of the caging results by the competent authority of the farm Member State.5.A difference greater than 10 % between the number of bluefin tuna individuals reported caught by the vessel or trap concerned and the number determined by the competent authority of the catching flag or trap Member State as result of the investigation shall constitute potential non-compliance of the vessel or trap concerned.6.The margin of error of 10 % referred to in paragraphs 1 and 5 shall be expressed as a percentage of the figures reported by the master of the fishing vessel or the master’s representative, or the trap operator or the trap operator’s representative, and shall be applicable at the level of individual caging operation.7.The catching flag or trap Member State shall determine the weight of bluefin tuna to be deducted from its national bluefin tuna quota, taking into account the quantities caged, calculated in accordance with Annex XI, which ensures that weight at caging is calculated based on the length-weight relationship for wild fish, and the reported mortalities, in accordance with Annex XIII.8.However, where the investigation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article concludes that bluefin tuna individuals are lost fish as defined in Annex XIII, the weight of the lost fish shall be deducted from the quota of the Member State in accordance with Annex XIII, by applying the average individual weight at caging communicated by the competent authority of the farm Member State, to the number of bluefin tuna individuals in the catch as determined by the competent authority of the flag or trap Member State resulting from its analysis of the first transfer video record in the context of the investigation.9.Notwithstanding paragraph 8, after consulting the competent authority of the flag Member State involved in the transport of fish to the farm of destination, the competent authority of the flag or trap Member State may decide not to deduct from the quota of the Member State the fish determined in the investigation as lost fish, where the losses have been duly documented as force majeure by the operator (i.e. pictures of the damaged cage, meteorological reports), the relevant information has been communicated to competent authority of the Member State of the operator immediately after the event and the losses did not result in known mortalities.Article 51Measures and programmes to determine the number and weight of bluefin tuna individuals being caged1.The competent authority of the farm Member State shall determine the number and weight of bluefin tuna individuals being caged, by analysing the video record of each caging operation provided by the farm operator. To carry out that analysis, the competent authorities of the farm Member State shall follow the procedures set out in Annex XI.2.When there is a difference greater than 10 % between the number or the weight determined by competent authority of the farm Member State and the corresponding figures reported in the ICCAT declaration on caging, the competent authority of the farm Member State shall launch an investigation to identify the reasons for the discrepancy and, as appropriate, adjust the number and/or weight of bluefin tuna individuals that have been caged. That margin of error of 10 % shall be expressed as a percentage of the figures provided by the farm operator.3.After the completion of a caging operation or, in case of a joint fishing operation or of traps of the same Member State, of the last caging operation associated with that joint fishing operation or with those traps, the farm Member State shall communicate the results of the stereoscopical programme referred to in Annex XI to the catching flag or trap Member State or CPC in accordance with Section B, point 2, of Annex XI.4.The farm Member State shall also communicate the results of the stereoscopical programme referred to in paragraph 3 to the entity operating the ICCAT regional observer programme on behalf of ICCAT.5.The stereoscopical programme referred to in paragraph 3 shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set out in Annex XI. Alternative methods may only be used if they have been endorsed by ICCAT during its annual meeting.6.Each farm Member State shall submit the procedures and results related to the stereoscopical programme or alternative methods referred to in paragraph 5 to the Commission by 30 September of each year in order to be transmitted to the SCRS by 31 October of each year.7.All bluefin tuna that die during a caging operation shall be reported by the farm operator, in accordance with Annex XIII.8.The catching flag or trap Member State shall issue a release order, in accordance with the procedures set out in Annex XII, for the quantities caged which exceed the quantities declared caught and transferred, if:

(a)the investigation referred to in Article 50(1) is not concluded within 10 working days from the communication of the results of the stereoscopical programme, for a single caging operation, or of all caging operations from a joint fishing operation; or

(b)the outcome of the investigation referred to in Article 50(1) indicates that the number and/or average weight of bluefin tuna is in excess of that declared caught and transferred.

The release of the excess shall be conducted in the presence of control authorities.9.The results of the stereoscopical programme shall be used to decide if releases are required and the caging declarations and relevant sections of the BCD shall be completed accordingly. When a release order has been issued, the farm operator shall request the presence of a national control authority and an ICCAT regional observer to monitor the release.Article 52Releases associated with caging operations1.The determination of the fish to be released shall be done in accordance with Section B, point 3, of Annex XI.2.If the weight of bluefin tuna being caged is in excess of that which had been declared as caught and/or transferred, the competent authority of the catching flag or trap Member State shall issue a release order and communicate it without delay to the competent authority of the farm Member State concerned. The release order shall be issued in accordance with Section B, point 3, of Annex XI, taking into account possible compensation at the joint fishing operation or trap level, in accordance with Section B, point 5, of Annex XI.3.The release operation shall be conducted in accordance with the protocol set out in Annex XII.’;