Commission Regulation (EU) No 822/2010

Contents

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1552/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on statistics relating to vocational training in enterprises^note, and in particular Articles 7(3), 8(2) and 9(4) thereof,Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EC) No 1552/2005 establishes a common framework for the production of European statistics on vocational training in enterprises.

(2)Commission Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 of 3 February 2006 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1552/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on statistics relating to vocational training in enterprises^note defines the specific data to be collected with respect to the training and non-training enterprises and to the different forms of vocational training, the sampling and precision requirements, the quality requirements for the data to be collected, the structure of the quality reports.

(3)Following the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2^note, detailed NACE Rev.2 and size categories into which the results can be broken down should be adopted.

(4)The Commission should define the specific data to be collected with respect to the training and non-training enterprises and to the different forms of vocational training.

(5)Implementing measures concerning the quality requirements for the data to be collected and transmitted for European statistics on vocational training in enterprises, the structure of the quality reports and any measures necessary for assessing or improving the quality of the data should be adopted.

(6)Regulation (EC) No 452/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 concerning the production and development of statistics on education and lifelong learning^note defines a new statistical instrument on the participation of adults in lifelong learning.

(7)In light of the information to be made available through Regulation (EC) No 452/2008 as well as of the need to improve the quality of the results on vocational training in enterprises and lower the statistical burden on enterprises, it is appropriate to modify the codification scheme, sampling, precision and quality requirements.

(8)Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(9)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the European Statistical System Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1 #

Annexes I, II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 are replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2 #

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Annex I

Variables

—enterprises providing CVT courses in 2010 [(B1a or B1b) = YES], or

—enterprises providing other forms of CVT [(B2a or B2b or B2c or B2d or B2e) = YES].

Note to the table:The values “core” and “key” in the column “variable group” are explained in Annex III. The value “ID” means that the variable is an “identification variable” (no missing allowed). In the column “variable type” the value “QL” refers to “Qualitative variable” of type Yes/No, “QM” to “Qualitative variable” with multiple categories as described in the table and “QT” refers to “Quantitative variable”. CVT stands for Continuing Vocational Training. NACE refers to economic activity according to NACE Rev 2.

1. Variables to be collected from all enterprises: sample characteristics

Variable name	Variable group	Variable description
COUNTRY	ID	Country code
REGION	ID	Region identification NUTS — level 1
REFYEAR	ID	Reference year
RESPID	ID	Enterprise ID
RESPWEIGHT	ID	Weighting factor Two decimal positions — use “.” as decimal separator
RESPEXTRA1	ID	Extra variable 1 (see Annex III)
RESPEXTRA2	ID	Extra variable 2 (see Annex III)
RESPEXTRA3	ID	Extra variable 3 (see Annex III)
SP_NACE	ID	Sampling plan economic activity category
SP_SIZE	ID	Sampling plan size group
SP_NSTRA	ID	Sampling plan – Number of enterprises in the stratum defined by NACE_SP and SIZE_SP, i.e. the population
SP_N	ID	Sampling plan — Number of sampled enterprises from the sample-frame in the stratum defined by NACE_SP and SIZE_SP
SP_SUB	ID	Sub-sample indicator, shows if enterprise belongs to sub-sample
N_RESPST	ID	Number of responding enterprises in the stratum defined by NACE_SP and SIZE_SP
N_EMPREG	ID	Number of persons employed according to the register
INTRESP	ID	Response indicator (sampling unit type)
INTMETHOD	ID	Data collection mode
INTLANG	ID	Language of data collection

2. Variables to be collected from all enterprises: background data

Variable name	Variable group	Variable type	Variable description
A1	Core	QL	Actual NACE CODE
A2tot	Core	QT	Total number of persons employed on 31 December of the reference year
A2m		QT	Total number of males employed on 31 December of the reference year
A2f		QT	Total number of females employed on 31 December of the reference year
A3	Key	QT	Total number of persons employed on 31 December of the previous year
A4	Key	QT	Total number of hours worked in the reference year by persons employed
A5	Key	QT	Total labour costs (direct + indirect) of all persons employed in the reference year
A6		QL	Introduction of any new or significantly new improved products or services or methods of producing or delivering products and services during the reference year.

3. Variables to be collected from all enterprises: CVT strategies

Variable name	Variable type	Variable description
A7	QL	Own or shared training centre
A8	QL	Person or unit within the enterprise with responsibility for the organisation of CVT
A9	QL	Assessment of future skill needs of the enterprise
A10	QM	Reaction to future needs through
		Continuing vocational training of current staff
		Recruitment of new staff with the suitable qualifications, skills and competences
		Recruitment of new staff combined with specific training
		Internal reorganisation to better use existing skills and competences
A11a	QM	Reviews of future skill and training needs of individual employees
		Yes, mainly by way of structured interviews
		Yes, but mainly by way of other methods
		No
A11b	QM	The reviews of future skill and training needs of individual employees focus on:
		Occupations or groups of occupations
		Skills and competences
		Working tasks and activities
		Formal qualifications
A12	QM	Skills and competences important in the next few years
		General IT skills
		IT professional skills
		Management skills
		Team working skills, customer handling skills, social skills
		Problem solving skills
		Office administration skills
		Foreign language skills
		Technical, practical or job-specific skills
		Oral or written communication skills
		Numeracy and/or literacy skills
		None of these
		Do not know
A13	QL	Planning of CVT in the enterprise lead to a written training plan or programme
A14	QL	Annual training budget, which includes provision for CVT
A15	QL	National, sector or other agreements between the social partners, which cover the provision of CVT
A16a	QL	Staff representatives/committees involved in the management process of continuing vocational training
A16b	QM	Aspects covered by staff representatives/committees
		Objective setting of training
		Establishing criteria for the selection of participants or specific target groups
		Form/type of training (e.g. internal/external courses; other forms such as guided on-the-job training)
		Content of training
		Budget for training
		Selection of external training providers
		Evaluation/assessment of training outcomes
A17	QM	Sources of information about CVT
		Public information centres/services and authorities
		Private training providers
		Personnel/staff representatives
		Others
		Do not use any such source of information

4. Variables to be collected from all enterprises: CVT characteristics

Variable name	Variable group	Variable type	Variable description
B1a	Core	QL	Provision of internal CVT courses in the reference year
B1b	Core	QL	Provision of external CVT courses in the reference year
B2a	Core	QL	Provision of guided on-the-job training in the reference year
		QT	Number of participants in guided on-the-job training
B2b	Core	QL	Provision of job rotation in the reference year
		QT	Number of participants: job-rotation, exchanges, secondments or study visits
B2c	Core	QL	Attendance at conferences/workshops in the reference year
		QT	Number of participants in conferences/workshops
B2d	Core	QL	Participation in learning and quality circles in the reference year
		QT	Number of participants in learning or quality circles
B2e	Core	QL	Planned training by self-directed learning/e-learning in the reference year
		QT	Number of participants in self-directed learning/e-learning
B3		QL	Provision of CVT courses in the year before the reference year
B4		QL	Provision of other forms of CVT in the year before the reference year
B5a		QL	Existence of CVT contributions in the reference year
		QT	Amount of contributions CVT (in euros)
B5b		QL	Existence of CVT receipts in the reference year
		QT	Amount of receipts CVT (in euros)
B6		QM	Measures the enterprise benefits from
			Tax incentives (tax allowances, tax exemptions, tax credits, tax relief, tax deferrals)
			Receipts from training funds (national, regional, sector)
			EU subsidies (e.g. European Social Fund)
			Government subsidies
			Other sources
			None of these

The following sections 5 and 6 shall be addressed to enterprises providing CVT courses in the reference year [(B1a or B1b) = YES].

Section 7 shall be addressed to all training enterprises in the reference year, i.e.:

Section 8 shall be addressed to non-training enterprises.

5. Variables to be collected from enterprises which provided CVT courses: CVT participants, subjects and providers

Variable name	Variable group	Variable type	Variable description
C1tot	Key	QT	Total number of CVT course participants
C2m		QT	Number of CVT course participants — males
C2f		QT	Number of CVT course participants — females
C3tot	Key	QT	Paid working time (in hours) spent on all CVT courses
C3i		QT	Paid working time (in hours) for internal CVT courses
C3e		QT	Paid working time (in hours) for external CVT courses
C4		QT	Share of training hours spent on obligatory courses for health and safety at work
C5		QL	Subjects covered
			General IT skills
			IT professional skills
			Management skills
			Team working skills, customer handling skills, social skills
			Problem solving skills
			Office administration skills
			Foreign language skills
			Technical, practical or job-specific skills
			Oral or written communication skills
			Numeracy and/or literacy skills
			None of these
C5Main		QL	Main subject (with respect to volume of training hours)
C6		QL	Providers (external courses)
			Schools, colleges, universities and other higher education institutions
			Public training institutions (financed or guided by the government; e.g. adult education centre)
			Private training companies
			Private companies whose main activity is not training
			Employer’s associations, chambers of commerce, sector bodies
			Trade unions
			Other training providers
C6Main		QL	Main provider (with respect to volume of training hours)

6. Variables to be collected from enterprises which provided CVT courses: CVT costs

Variable name	Variable group	Variable type	Variable description
C7a		QL	Existence of fees
		QT	CVT course costs — fees and payments for courses for employees (in euros)
C7b		QL	Existence of travel costs
		QT	CVT course costs — travel and subsistence payments (in euros)
C7c		QL	Existence of labour costs of internal trainers
		QT	CVT course costs — labour costs of internal trainers (in euros)
C7d		QL	Existence of costs of training centre and teaching materials etc.
		QT	CVT course costs — training centre, or rooms and teaching materials for CVT courses (in euros)
C7sub		QL	Existence of “Sub-total only” (no sub-categories)
	Key	QT	CVT costs sub-total (in euros)
PAC	Key	QT	Personal absence cost — to be calculated (PAC=C3tot*A5/A4 in euros)
C7tot	Key	QT	Total cost CVT — to be calculated (C7sub + B5a – B5b (in euros)

7. Variables to be collected from enterprises which provided CVT courses or other forms of CVT: CVT quality, outcomes and difficulties

Variable name	Variable type	Variable description
D1	QM	Aspects considered to ensure the quality of CVT
		Certification of external providers (e.g. use of national registers)
		Continuous training of internal trainers
		Continuing vocational training and certification is based on national/sector recognised standards or frameworks
		Others
		No particular aspect considered
D2a	QM	Assessment of the outcomes of CVT activities
		Yes, for all activities
		Yes, for some activities
		No, proof of participation is sufficient
D2b	QM	Methods of assessment
		Certification after written or practical test
		Satisfaction survey amongst participants
		Assessment of participants’ behaviour or performance in relation to training objectives
		Assessment/measurement of the impact of training on performance of relevant departments or the whole enterprise
		Other
D3	QM	Factors limiting CVT provision in the reference year
		No limiting factor: level of training provided was appropriate to the enterprises needs
		Recruitment of individuals with the required qualifications, skills and competencies
		Difficulties in assessing training needs in the enterprise
		Lack of suitable offerings of CVT courses in the market
		High costs of CVT courses
		Higher focus on IVT provision than on CVT
		Major efforts in CVT realised in recent years
		Limited time available for staff to participate in CVT
		Other reasons

8. Variables to be collected from non-training enterprises: reasons for the non-provision of CVT activities

Variable name	Variable type	Variable description
E1	QM	Reasons for not providing CVT in the reference year
		The existing qualifications, skills and competences were appropriate to the current needs of the enterprise
		Recruitment of individuals with the required qualifications, skills and competencies was preferred
		Difficulties in assessing training needs in the enterprise
		Lack of suitable offerings of CVT courses in the market
		High costs of CVT courses
		Higher focus on IVT provision than on CVT
		Major efforts in CVT realised in recent years
		No time available for staff to participate in CVT
		Other reasons

9. Variables to be collected from all enterprises: IVT

Variable name	Variable group	Variable type	Variable description
F1tot	Core	QT	Total number of IVT participants in the enterprise during the reference year
F2		QM	Reasons for providing IVT (if F1Tot > 0)
			To qualify future employees according to the needs of the enterprise
			To choose the best apprentices for future employment after completion of initial vocational training
			To avoid possible mismatch with enterprise needs in case of external recruitment
			To make use of the productive capacities of IVT participants already during their initial vocational training
			Other (e.g. to make the enterprise more attractive to potential staff)

Optional variables

Member States can transmit complementary variables to the Commission (Eurostat) on an optional basis in a harmonised format as described in the “European Union Manual” referred to in Article 8.’;

Annex II

Sample

1.Business registers referred to in Regulation (EC) No 177/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 establishing a common framework for business registers for statistical purposes^note shall be taken as the main source of the sampling frame. A nationally representative stratified probability sample of enterprises shall be taken from this frame.

2.The sample shall be stratified by NACE Rev.2 and size category according to the following minimum specification:

—20 NACE Rev.2 categories [B, C10-C12, C13-C15, C17-C18, C19-C23, C24-C25, C26-C28 and C33, C29-C30, C16+C31-32, D-E, F, G(45), G(46), G(47), I, H, J, K(64,65), K(66), L+M+N+R+S],

—Member States can cover other sectors and use additional categories for the stratification (e.g. O, P, and Q) on an optional basis,

—3 enterprise size categories, according to their number of persons employed: (10-49) (50-249) (250 and more) for countries with fewer than 50 million inhabitants,

—6 enterprise size categories, according to their number of persons employed: (10-19) (20-49) (50-249) (250-499) (500-999) (1000 and more) for Member States with 50 million inhabitants and more.

3.A sample size shall be calculated to assure a maximum half-length of the 95 % confidence interval of 0,2 for the estimated parameters, which are a proportion of “training enterprises” (after allowance for the non-response rate in the sample) for each of the 60 stratified elements identified above (120 stratified elements for Member States with 50 million inhabitants and more).

4.The following formula may be used in determining the sample size:n_h = 1/[c² × te_h + 1/N_h] / r_hWhere:r_hthe anticipated response rate in the stratum cell, hcmaximum length of half the confidence intervalte_hthe anticipated proportion of training enterprises in the stratum cell, hN_hthe total number of enterprises (training and non-training) in the stratum cell, h

III

Imputation principles and record weighting

1.When a record contains less than 50 % of variables presented then this record shall normally be considered as a unit non-response.

2.For a single NACE Rev.2/size cell imputations shall not be allowed if more than 50 % of the responding enterprises have missing data for more than 25 % of the quantitative variables.

3.For a single NACE Rev.2/size cell, no imputation shall be performed on a quantitative variable if the proportion of responding enterprises for that particular variable is less than 50 %.

4.For a single NACE Rev.2/size cell, no imputation shall be performed on a qualitative variable if the proportion of responding enterprises for that particular variable is less than 80 %.

—A1, A2tot, B1a, B1b, B2a(QL), B2b(QL) B2c(QL), B2d(QL) B2e(QL), F1tot.

—A3, A4, A5, C1tot, C3tot, C7sub, C7tot, PAC.

Countries shall take all appropriate measures to reduce item and unit non-response. Prior to imputation countries shall make all reasonable efforts to use other data sources.

Core variables, for which no missing value shall be accepted, nor imputation permitted are:

Key variables, for which every effort should be made to avoid missing values and for which imputation is recommended are:

Imputation for item non-response shall be recommended within the following general limits:

Quantitative and qualitative variables are identified in Annex I.

Member States shall calculate and transmit a weight to be applied to each data record together with any auxiliary variables, which may have been used in the calculation of this weight. These auxiliary variables should be recorded as the variables RESPEXTRA1, RESPEXTRA2, RESPEXTRA3 as necessary. The methodology adopted for establishing the weights shall be detailed in the quality report.’;

Annex V

Quality report format

Member States shall submit quality reports to be written according to a standard quality-reporting format provided by the Commission (Eurostat). A copy of the national questionnaire shall accompany the quality report.

1. Relevance

Implementation of the survey and the degree to which statistics meet current and potential users’ needs. This covers a description of users and their individual needs as well as an evaluation of to what degree these needs have been satisfied.

2. Accuracy

2.1. Sampling errors

—Description of the sample design and the realised sample.

—Number of enterprises in the sampling frame.

—Coefficients of variation^note for the following key statistics.

—Description of the calculation of the final weights including non-response model and auxiliary variables used, estimator used, e.g. Horvitz-Thompson estimator, variance of the estimates according to the sample strata, variance estimation software, in particular, a description of the auxiliary variables or information used should be reported in order to recalculate the final weights within Eurostat since it is needed for variance estimation.

—Number of enterprises in the sample.

—Total number of persons employed, total number of enterprises that provided CVT, ratio of the total number of enterprises that provided CVT to the total number of enterprises.

—In case of non-response analysis, a description of the biases in the sample and results.

—Total number of enterprises that provided CVT courses, ratio of the total number of enterprises that provided CVT courses to the total number of enterprises.

—Total number of persons employed in enterprises that provided CVT, total number of participants in CVT courses, ratio of the total number of participants in CVT courses to the total number of persons employed, ratio of the total number of participants in CVT courses to the total number of persons employed in enterprises that provided CVT.

—Total costs of CVT courses.

—Total number of enterprises providing IVT, total number of participants in IVT, ratio of the total number of enterprises providing IVT to the total number of enterprises.

This covers:

Tables to be provided (broken down by NACE Rev.2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan):

Tables to be provided (broken down by NACE Rev.2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan, however allocation according to the observed enterprise characteristics):

2.2. Non-sampling errors

2.2.1. Coverage errors

—Description of the register used for sampling and its overall quality, information included in the register, and its updating frequency.

—Number of enterprises.

—Errors due to the discrepancies between the sampling frame and the target population and sub-populations (over-coverage, under-coverage, misclassifications).

—Ratio of the number of enterprises for which the observed strata equals the sampling strata.

—Methods used to obtain this information and notes on the processing of misclassifications.

This covers:

Tables to be provided (broken down by NACE Rev.2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan, however allocation according to the observed enterprise characteristics):

2.2.2. Measurement errors

—The questionnaire design (results of pre-tests or laboratory methods; questioning strategies).

—Reporting unit/respondent considering the data collection mode used (e.g. problems and strategies to find the appropriate respondent(s) in the enterprise, memory problems, errors when filling the forms, assistance to the respondent). This includes a description and assessment of measures taken to assure the high quality of the information related to “participants” and to assure that “participant events” were not collected.

—Existence/use of relevant information systems and administrative records in the enterprise, e.g. correspondence between the administrative and survey concept (reference period, availability of individual data).

—Methods used to reduce this kind of errors, problems with the questionnaire as a whole or with single questions.

Where appropriate an assessment of errors that occurred at the stage of data collection due for example to:

2.2.3. Processing errors

This covers a description of the data editing process such as processing system and tools used, errors due to coding, editing, weighting or tabulation, quality checks at macro/micro level and corrections/failed edits.

2.2.4. Non-response errors

—Full report on imputation procedures including methods used for imputation and/or re-weighting.

—Unit response rates^note.

—Methodological notes and results of non-response analysis or other methods to assess the effects of non-response.

—Item response rates^note for the following with respect to all respondents: total number of hours work as a function of all respondents and total labour cost as a function of all respondents.

—Item response rates for the following with respect to enterprises offering CVT courses:

—Total number of participants in courses, males, females as a function of enterprises offering CVT courses.

—Total number of hours on CVT courses as a function of enterprises offering CVT courses, number of hours on CVT courses managed internally and externally as a function of enterprises offering CVT courses.

—Total costs of CVT courses as a function of enterprises offering CVT courses.

—Item response rates for the following with respect to enterprises offering IVT: Total number of participants in IVT as a function of enterprises offering IVT.

This covers an assessment of unit non-response and item non-response and a description of the measures undertaken regarding “re-contacts” as well as:

Tables to be provided (broken down by NACE Rev.2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan, however allocation according to the observed enterprise characteristics):

3. Timeliness and punctuality

This covers a table of dates when each of the following phases of the project started and ended such as fieldwork (considering the different data collection modes), reminders and follow-up, data checking and editing, further validation and imputation, non-response survey (as appropriate) and estimations as well as data transmission to Eurostat and dissemination of national results.

4. Accessibility and clarity

This covers the type of results sent to enterprises, a dissemination scheme of results and a copy of any methodological documents relating to the statistics provided.

5. Comparability

This covers the deviations from the standard European questionnaire and definitions provided in the manual referred to in Article 8 and a description of links done with other statistical sources (use of certain data available in registers, survey linked to another national survey).

6. Coherence

—Number of persons employed from structural business statistics and number of persons employed from CVTS.

—Percentage of differences (SBS — CVTS)/SBS.

This covers a comparison of statistics for the same phenomenon or item from other surveys or sources and an assessment of coherence with structural business statistics for the number of persons employed as a function of NACE Rev.2 and Size Group.

Tables to provide (broken down by NACE Rev.2 and size classes according to the national sampling plan, however allocation according to the observed enterprise characteristics):

7. Cost and burden

This covers an analysis of the burden and benefit at national level through, for example, a consideration of average time for answering to each questionnaire, problematic questions and variables, variables most/least useful in describing CVT at national level, estimated or actual satisfaction level of data users at national level, difference of burden between for small and large enterprises and efforts made to reduce burden.

1.Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following:

2.Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following:

3.Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following:

4.Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 198/2006 is replaced by the following:

Defined terms · 3

Show every defined term

ID
means that the variable is an “identification variable” (no missing allowed).
QL
refers to “Qualitative variable” of type Yes/No, “QM” to “Qualitative variable” with multiple categories as described in the table and “QT” refers to “Quantitative variable”.
QT
refers to “Quantitative variable”.

Defined terms · 3

Connections

Key facts

History · 2 versions