24Furthermore, questions relating to EU law enjoy a presumption of relevance. The Court may refuse to rule on a question referred for a preliminary ruling by a national court only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of EU law that is sought bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its purpose, where the problem is hypothetical, or where the Court does not have before it the factual or legal material necessary to give a useful answer to the questions submitted to it (see judgments of 15 December 1995, Bosman, C‑415/93, EU:C:1995:463, paragraphs 59 and 61; of 7 September 1999, Beck and Bergdorf, C‑355/97, EU:C:1999:391, paragraph 22; and of 11 December 2025, Kuszycka, C‑767/24, EU:C:2025:962, paragraph 34).