Judgment_paragraph 28 · bluechip Computer Aktiengesellschaft v Zentralstelle für private Überspielungsrechte (ZPÜ) (C-822/24)

28Since Directive 2001/29 does not provide any further details concerning the various elements of the system of fair compensation, the Member States enjoy a broad discretion in that regard. In particular, it falls to the Member States to determine the persons who must pay that compensation and to establish the form, detailed arrangements and level thereof (judgment of 8 September 2022, Ametic, C‑263/21, EU:C:2022:644, paragraph 36 and the case-law cited). When determining the form, detailed arrangements and possible level of fair compensation, it is for the Member States, as is apparent from recital 35 of Directive 2001/29, to take account of the particular circumstances of each case and, in particular, of the possible harm to the rightholders (judgment of 23 November 2023, Seven.One Entertainment Group, C‑260/22, EU:C:2023:900, paragraph 36).

bluechip Computer Aktiengesellschaft v Zentralstelle für private Überspielungsrechte (ZPÜ) (C-822/24)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections