Judgment_paragraph 41 · LH v OTP banka d.d., anciennement NOVA KREDITNA BANKA MARIBOR (C-81/24)

41As a preliminary point, it must be recalled that the provisions of Directive 2015/849, which are preventive in nature, seek to establish, taking a risk-based approach, a body of preventive and dissuasive measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing effectively in order to prevent, as is apparent from recital 1 of that directive, flows of illicit money from being able to damage the integrity, stability and reputation of the financial sector and threaten the internal market of the European Union as well as international development (see, to that effect, judgment of 17 November 2022, Rodl & Partner, C‑562/20, EU:C:2022:883, paragraph 34 and the case-law cited).

LH v OTP banka d.d., anciennement NOVA KREDITNA BANKA MARIBOR (C-81/24)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections