Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Staatssecretaris Jeugd, Preventie en Sport v Diamond Flavours BV and UEG Holland BV (C-665/24)
Consideration of the questions referred
The second question
44

Staatssecretaris Jeugd, Preventie en Sport v Diamond Flavours BV and UEG Holland BV (C-665/24)

law://eu/cjeu/2024/c-665-24/para_44@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Seventh Chamber
Case: C-665/24 · ECLI:EU:C:2025:960
Decided: 11 Dec 2025
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Supreme Administrative Court for Trade and Industry, Netherlands)
Applicant: Staatssecretaris Jeugd, Preventie en Sport
Defendants: Diamond Flavours BV; UEG Holland BV
Rapporteur: K. Jürimäe
Advocate General: M. Szpunar
Bench: 3 judges
K. Jürimäe, M. Gavalec, Z. Csehi
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62024CJ0665

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

11 Dec 2025Reading

Judgment of 11 Dec 2025

44Regarding that principle, it follows from the Court’s case-law that such a system is not in itself incompatible with EU law (see, to that effect, judgments of 10 July 1990, Hansen, C‑326/88, EU:C:1990:291, paragraph 19; of 27 February 1997, Ebony Maritime and Loten Navigation, C‑177/95, EU:C:1997:89, paragraph 36; of 11 July 2002, Käserei Champignon Hofmeister, C‑210/00, EU:C:2002:440, paragraph 47; and of 9 February 2012, Urbán, C‑210/10, EU:C:2012:64, paragraph 47).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 1: Ts. E. S. v Direktor na Teritorialno podelenie na Natsionalnia osiguritelen institut - Blagoevgrad (C-116/25)
Cites 4: Márton Urbán v Vám- és Pénzügyőrség Észak-alföldi Regionális Parancsnoksága (C-210/10); Käserei Champignon Hofmeister GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (C-210/00); Anklagemyndigheden v Hansen & Soen I/S (326/88); Ebony Maritime SA and Loten Navigation Co. Ltd v Prefetto della Provincia di Brindisi and others (C-177/95)