Judgment_paragraph 71 · Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ and Others v European Commission (C-499/24 P)

71Referring to the judgment of 21 February 2024, Sinopec Chongqing SVW Chemical and Others v Commission (T‑762/20, EU:T:2024:113, paragraph 129), according to which the EU institutions are required, inter alia, under the principle of good administration, to indicate to the party requesting an adjustment what information is necessary for that purpose, and not to impose an unreasonable burden of proof on that party, the appellants submit that, in the light of the period of only 10 days allowed to them to submit observations at the definitive disclosure stage, it would have been almost impossible for them to provide a new production cost converted into Turkish lira, on the basis of a daily exchange rate. In any event, they argue, the General Court stated, in paragraph 114 of the judgment under appeal, that a new list provided after the end of the verification (or the remote cross-check) could not have been taken into account, with the result that it is not clear what benefit there would have been in providing such a list.

Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları TAŞ and Others v European Commission (C-499/24 P)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version