Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised v Vabariigi Valimiskomisjon and Others (C-438/24)

Judgment of 17 Sept 2026

law://eu/cjeu/2024/c-438-24/para_30@2026-11-13

30According to settled case-law, questions relating to EU law enjoy a presumption of relevance. The Court may refuse to rule on a question referred by a national court for a preliminary ruling only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of EU law that is sought bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its purpose, where the problem is hypothetical, or where the Court does not have before it the factual or legal material necessary to give a useful answer to the questions submitted to it (judgment of 23 November 2021, IS (Illegality of the order for reference), C‑564/19, EU:C:2021:949, paragraph 61 and the case-law cited).

Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised v Vabariigi Valimiskomisjon and Others (C-438/24)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version