Judgment_paragraph 41 · Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union (C-326/24 P)

41In that regard, it should be observed that, according to consistent case-law of the Court of Justice, the purpose of the obligation to state the reasons on which an act adversely affecting an individual is based, which is a corollary of the principle of respect for the rights of the defence, is, first, to provide the person concerned with sufficient information to make it possible to ascertain whether the act is well founded or whether it is vitiated by a defect which may permit its legality to be contested before the European Union judicature and, second, to enable that judicature to review the legality of that act (judgment of 15 November 2012, Council v Bamba, C‑417/11 P, ECR, EU:C:2012:718, paragraph 49 and the case-law cited).

Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union (C-326/24 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections