Judgment_paragraph 40 · RT and ED v Ineo Infracom (C-249/24)

40The Court also ruled that, having regard to the objective of Directive 98/59, which is, as is apparent from recital 2 thereof, to afford greater protection to workers in the event of collective redundancies, a narrow definition cannot be given to the concepts that define the scope of that directive, including the concept of ‘redundancy’ in point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 1(1) thereof (judgment of 11 July 2024, Plamaro, C‑196/23, EU:C:2024:596, paragraph 26 and the case-law cited).

RT and ED v Ineo Infracom (C-249/24)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections