Judgment_paragraph 38 · M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o (C-20/24)

38Furthermore, according to settled case-law, in interpreting a provision of EU law, it is necessary to consider not only its wording but also the context in which it occurs and the objectives pursued by the rules of which it is part (judgment of 21 November 2024, Mesto Rimavská Sobota, C‑370/23, EU:C:2024:972, paragraph 25 and the case-law cited).

M1.R. and M2.R. v AAA sp. z o.o (C-20/24)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version