Judgment_paragraph 84 · WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. and Others v Ministre de la Culture and Others (C-188/24)

84As regards the second of the conditions set out in Article 3(4)(a) of Directive 2000/31, according to which measures derogating from Article 3(2) must be taken against a given information society service which actually prejudices the objectives referred to in paragraphs 81 to 83 above or presents a serious and grave risk of prejudice to those objectives, it should be borne in mind that that condition must be interpreted as meaning that general and abstract measures aimed at a category of given information society services described in general terms and applying without distinction to any provider of that category of services do not meet those conditions (see, to that effect, judgments of 9 November 2023, Google Ireland and Others, C‑376/22, EU:C:2023:835, paragraph 60; of 30 May 2024, Airbnb Ireland and Amazon Services Europe, C‑662/22 and C‑667/22, EU:C:2024:432, paragraph 70; and of 21 April 2026, Commission v Hungary (Values of the European Union), C‑769/22, EU:C:2026:326, paragraph 309).

WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. and Others v Ministre de la Culture and Others (C-188/24)

Connections

Key facts

History · 1 version