Judgment_paragraph 90 · Uniper Global Commodities SE v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-96/23)

90As a preliminary remark, it should be observed that the reference to ‘specific conditions and arrangements’ in the fifth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU must be interpreted as concerning only the drawing up, by an institution, body, office or agency of the European Union, of purely internal terms and conditions which are prerequisites to legal proceedings, governing, inter alia, the operation of a self-monitoring mechanism or the course of an out-of-court settlement with a view to avoiding litigation before the Courts of the European Union (see, to that effect, order of 12 September 2013, European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v OHIM, T‑556/11, EU:T:2013:514, paragraph 60, and judgment of 25 October 2018, KF v SatCen, T‑286/15, EU:T:2018:718, paragraph 107). Those specific conditions and arrangements must therefore remain entirely consistent with the general scheme laid down in Article 263 TFEU so far as concerns the jurisdiction of the EU judicature to hear proceedings assigned to it (see, to that effect, judgments of 4 February 2016, Italian International Film v EACEA, T‑676/13, EU:T:2016:62, paragraph 27; of 8 June 2016, Monster Energy v EUIPO (Representation of a peace symbol), T‑583/15, EU:T:2016:338, paragraph 43; and of 8 June 2016 Monster Energy v EUIPO (GREEN BEANS), T‑585/15, not published, EU:T:2016:339, paragraph 41).

Uniper Global Commodities SE v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-96/23)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version