69Secondly, the note from the Secretary‑General of the Parliament of 24 November 2005 is purely informative and was drawn up for the Members of the Bureau, which submits to Parliament certain proposals concerning the financing of the Fund, following the adoption of the Statute. It is accordingly an internal note which, by definition, is not intended for the beneficiaries of the Fund. Moreover, as observed by the Parliament, that note, which is part of the internal decision-making process, reflects only the position of an administrative service of the Parliament, namely the Secretary‑General, and not that of the Bureau, which is the competent body for dealing with amendments to substantive conditions of the AVPS (judgment of 9 March 2023, Grossetête v Parliament, C‑714/21 P, not published, EU:C:2023:187, paragraph 74). Hence that note cannot be regarded as containing assurances provided by the administration to the beneficiaries of the Fund (see, to that effect, judgment of 26 September 2002, Borremans and Others v Commission, T‑319/00, EU:T:2002:229, paragraph 67). Moreover, the fact that some applicants were able to have access to that note in their capacity as Members of Parliament does not call that conclusion into question; otherwise, that would amount to conferring on them a form of protection of legitimate expectations specific to them.