Comité interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne and Institut national de l'origine et de la qualité (INAO) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-239/23)

Judgment of 25 Jun 2025

law://eu/cjeu/2023/t-239-23/para_97@2026-11-15

97The same does not apply, however, to costs incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Opposition Division. Accordingly, the applicants’ request that EUIPO and Nero Lifestyle be ordered to pay the costs of the administrative proceedings before EUIPO can be allowed only as regards the costs necessarily incurred by the applicants for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal (judgment of 12 January 2006, Devinlec v OHIM – TIME ART (QUANTUM), T‑147/03, EU:T:2006:10, paragraph 115).

Comité interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne and Institut national de l'origine et de la qualité (INAO) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-239/23)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version