Judgment_paragraph 59 · Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-731/23 P)

59However, it is also clear from settled case-law that where a measure affects a group of persons who were identified or identifiable when that measure was adopted by reason of criteria specific to the members of the group, those persons may be individually concerned by that measure inasmuch as they form part of a limited class of economic operators (see, to that effect, judgments of 17 January 1985, Piraiki-Patraiki and Others v Commission, 11/82, EU:C:1985:18, paragraph 31; of 22 June 2006, Belgium and Forum 187 v Commission, C‑182/03 and C‑217/03, EU:C:2006:416, paragraph 60; of 13 March 2008, Commission v Infront WM, C‑125/06 P, EU:C:2008:159, paragraph 71; and of 12 July 2022, Nord Stream 2 v Parliament and Council, C‑348/20 P, EU:C:2022:548, paragraph 158). That may be the case particularly when the measure alters rights acquired by the individual prior to its adoption (judgments of 13 March 2008, Commission v Infront WM, C‑125/06 P, EU:C:2008:159, paragraph 72, and of 27 February 2014, Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission, C‑132/12 P, EU:C:2014:100, paragraph 59).

Nicoventures Trading Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-731/23 P)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version