Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union (C-696/23 P)

Judgment of 26 Mar 2026

law://eu/cjeu/2023/c-696-23/para_101@2026-11-14

101Furthermore, it must be borne in mind that the statement of reasons for a judgment or an order of the General Court must clearly and unequivocally disclose the General Court’s reasoning, in such a way as to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons for the decision taken and to enable the Court of Justice to exercise its power of review. The obligation to state reasons incumbent on the General Court does not require the General Court to provide an account which follows exhaustively and one by one all the arguments put forward by the parties to the case, and the reasoning may thus be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons why it has not upheld their arguments and provides the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (judgment of 18 January 2024, Jenkinson v Council and Others, C‑46/22 P, EU:C:2024:50, paragraph 131 and the case-law cited).

Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy and Others v Council of the European Union (C-696/23 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections