Elliniki Ornithologiki Etaireia and Others v Ypourgos Esoterikon and Others (C-66/23)

Judgment of 12 Sept 2024

law://eu/cjeu/2023/c-66-23/para_59@2026-11-12

59Having regard to all the foregoing considerations, the answer to the first question is that Article 4(1) and (2) of the Birds Directive and Article 6(2) to (4) of the Habitats Directive must be interpreted as requiring Member States to establish, for each SPA, individual conservation objectives and conservation measures for all protected species and their habitat. In doing so, Member States are responsible for defining priorities according to the significance of those measures for achieving conservation objectives in respect of all those species.

Elliniki Ornithologiki Etaireia and Others v Ypourgos Esoterikon and Others (C-66/23)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections