Judgment_paragraph 53 · Neos SpA v Ryanair DAC and European Commission (C-490/23 P)

53It must be pointed out that the question of whether the reasoning for an act is well founded is a separate matter from whether that reasoning is sufficient. Accordingly, even if it were assumed that the conjunction of the findings made in recitals 93 and 95 of the decision at issue reveals an error in law, that error cannot be penalised on the basis of the obligation to state reasons set out in the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU.

Neos SpA v Ryanair DAC and European Commission (C-490/23 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections