Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH v European Commission (C-466/23 P)
The procedure before the Court of Just…
19

Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH v European Commission (C-466/23 P)

law://eu/cjeu/2023/c-466-23/para_19@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-466/23 P · ECLI:EU:C:2025:480
Decided: 26 Jun 2025
Procedure: Appeal
Ruled invalid: 62020TJ0314
Applicant: Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: J. Passer
Advocate General: L. Medina
Bench: 5 judges
M.L. Arastey Sahún, D. Gratsias, E. Regan, J. Passer, B. Smulders
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62023CJ0466

Topics

Concentrations between undertakings

Connections

Interprets 1: Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission (T-314/20)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004; EVH GmbH and Others v European Commission (C-464/23); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-525/04 P); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-312/20); French Republic and Société commerciale des potasses et de l'azote (SCPA) and Entreprise minière et chimique (EMC) v Commission of the European Communities (C-68/94, C-30/95); Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe „Primart” Marek Łukasiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-702/18 P); Land Rheinland-Pfalz v Deutsche Lufthansa AG (C-466/21 P); Moccia Irme SpA, Ferriera Lamifer SpA and Ferriera Acciaieria Casilina SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-280/99 P, C-281/99 P, C-282/99 P); Anne Hogan v Court of Justice of the European Communities (C-173/95); Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission (T-314/20); Association médicale européenne (EMA) v European Commission (C-100/14)

History · 1 version

26 Jun 2025Reading

Judgment of 26 Jun 2025

19By decision of 19 September 2023, the President of the Court of Justice, after hearing the parties on that request for a stay of proceedings and on a possible joinder of nine appeals – including the present appeal – in Cases C‑464/23 P, C‑465/23 P, C‑466/23 P, C‑467/23 P, C‑468/23 P, C‑469/23 P, C‑470/23 P, C‑484/23 P and C‑485/23 P brought against the judgments of the General Court in Cases T‑312/20, T‑313/20, T‑314/20, T‑315/20, T‑317/20, T‑318/20, T‑319/20, T‑320/20 and T‑321/20, dismissed that request for a stay of proceedings and ordered that only the appeals in Cases C‑464/23 P, C‑465/23 P, C‑467/23 P, C‑468/23 P and C‑470/23 P concerning judgments of the General Court delivered on the substance, to the exclusion of the other four appeals, including the present appeal, brought against judgments delivered by the General Court declaring the actions inadmissible, be joined.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.