Judgment_paragraph 151 · Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Ryanair DAC and Condor Flugdienst GmbH (C-457/23 P)

151It should be observed that, according to settled case-law, the statement of reasons required by the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU must be appropriate to the measure at issue and must disclose in a clear and unequivocal fashion the reasoning followed by the institution which adopted the measures in such a way as to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons for the measure and to enable the Court having jurisdiction to exercise its power of review. The requirements to be satisfied by the statement of reasons depend on the circumstances of each case, in particular, the content of the measure in question, the nature of the reasons given and the interest which the addressees of the measure, or other parties to whom it is of direct and individual concern, may have in obtaining explanations. It is not necessary for the reasoning to specify all the relevant facts and points of law, since the question whether the statement of reasons meets the requirements of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU must be assessed with regard not only to its wording but also to its context and to all the legal rules governing the matter in question (judgment of 23 January 2025, Neos v Ryanair and Commission, C‑490/23 P, EU:C:2025:32, paragraph 34 and the case-law cited).

Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Ryanair DAC and Condor Flugdienst GmbH (C-457/23 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections