Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
AV and Others v Ministero della Giustizia (C-41/23)
Consideration of the questions referred
Substance
The first question
50

AV and Others v Ministero della Giustizia (C-41/23)

Judgment of 27 Jun 2024law://eu/cjeu/2023/c-41-23/para_50@2026-11-12

50If it is established that honorary members of the judiciary such as the applicants in the main proceedings are in a situation comparable to that of ordinary members of the judiciary, it is necessary to ascertain whether there are objective reasons justifying such different treatment.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-41/23 · ECLI:EU:C:2024:554
Decided: 27 Jun 2024
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State, Italy)
Applicants: AV; BT; CV; DW
Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 3 judges
T. von Danwitz, A. Arabadjiev, I. Ziemele
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62023CJ0041

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of movement for workers Social policy

History · 1 version

27 Jun 2024Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP
Cited by 2: Ministero della Giustizia v NZ (C-253/24)2 provisions; M.M. v Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri and Others (C-548/22)
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); MJ v AxFina Hungary Zrt (C-705/21); Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time; UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana (C-658/18); Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP; PG v Ministero della Giustizia and Others (C-236/20); Margarita Isabel Vega González v Consejería de Hacienda y Sector Público del gobierno del Principado de Asturias (C-158/16); Raffaella Mascolo and Others v Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca and Comune di Napoli (C-22/13, C-61/13, C-62/13, C-63/13, C-418/13)