Judgment_paragraph 67 · Tecno*37 v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Bologna (C-242/23)

67While it is ultimately for the national court, which has sole jurisdiction to assess the facts and interpret national legislation, to determine whether the requirements laid down by national legislation meet the conditions provided for in point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 25(1) of Directive 2006/123, the Court, in the context of a reference for a preliminary ruling, may provide the referring court with guidance, on the basis of the documents relating to the main proceedings and the written and oral observations which have been submitted to it, in order to enable that court to resolve the dispute before it (see, to that effect, judgment of 2 March 2023, PrivatBank and Others, C‑78/21, EU:C:2023:137, paragraph 71 and the case-law cited).

Tecno*37 v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato e Agricoltura di Bologna (C-242/23)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections