48Where it is not obvious that the interpretation of a provision of EU law bears no relation to the facts of the main action or its purpose, the objection alleging the inapplicability of that provision to the case in the main action cannot rebut the presumption that the questions referred are relevant and must be examined in the context of the analysis of the questions raised as regards the substance (see, to that effect, judgment of 7 March 2024, Roheline Kogukond and Others, C‑234/22, EU:C:2024:211, paragraph 27 and 29 and the case-law cited).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.