60However, as is apparent from paragraphs 35 and 43 above, the Court based that interpretation of Article 33(2)(d) of Directive 2013/32 on the special status enjoyed, under the protocol mentioned in the preceding paragraph, by the Kingdom of Denmark as regards Title V of Part Three of the FEU Treaty, which covers, inter alia, policies on border checks, asylum and immigration. In accordance with that protocol, Directive 2011/95 does not apply to that Member State, with the result that an application for international protection made to the competent authorities of that Member State cannot constitute an application ‘seek[ing] refugee status or subsidiary protection status’ within the meaning of Directive 2011/95.