Judgment_paragraph 22 · CCC v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) and Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-673/22)

22As a preliminary point, it must be borne in mind that it is solely for the national court before which the dispute has been brought, and which must assume responsibility for the subsequent judicial decision, to determine, in the light of the particular circumstances of the case, both the need for a preliminary ruling in order to enable it to deliver judgment and the relevance of the questions which it submits to the Court. Consequently, where the questions submitted concern the interpretation of a rule of EU law, the Court is, in principle, bound to give a ruling. Questions relating to EU law enjoy a presumption of relevance (see, to that effect, judgment of 6 October 2021, Sumal, C‑882/19, EU:C:2021:800, paragraphs 27 and 28 and the case-law cited).

CCC v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) and Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) (C-673/22)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version