Judgment_paragraph 47 · C. Z. and Others v Ilva SpA in Amministrazione Straordinaria and Others (C-626/22)

47It follows that questions relating to EU law enjoy a presumption of relevance. The Court may refuse to rule on a question referred by a national court for a preliminary ruling only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of EU law that is sought bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its purpose, where the problem is hypothetical, or where the Court does not have before it the factual or legal material necessary to give a useful answer to the questions submitted to it (judgment of 7 April 2022, Avio Lucos, C‑116/20, EU:C:2022:273, paragraph 38 and the case-law cited).

C. Z. and Others v Ilva SpA in Amministrazione Straordinaria and Others (C-626/22)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version