Judgment_paragraph 58 · thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission (C-581/22 P)

58A ground of appeal supported by an argument that is not sufficiently clear and precise to enable the Court to exercise its powers of judicial review, in particular because essential elements on which the ground of appeal is based are not indicated sufficiently coherently and intelligibly in the text of the appeal, which is worded in a vague and ambiguous manner in that regard, does not satisfy those requirements and must be dismissed as inadmissible. The Court has also held that an appeal lacking any coherent structure which simply makes general statements and contains no specific indications as to the points of the decision under appeal which may be vitiated by an error of law must be dismissed as clearly inadmissible (judgment of 28 September 2023, QI and Others v Commission and ECB, C‑262/22 P, EU:C:2023:714, paragraph 72).

thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission (C-581/22 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections