Eurobolt BV and Others v European Commission and Stafa Group (C-517/22 P)

Judgment of 11 Jan 2024

law://eu/cjeu/2022/c-517-22/para_55@2026-11-14

55In the second place, regarding the appellants’ argument that Article 266 TFEU requires repayment of the duties previously paid where they were not legally due, it is true that this is, in principle, the case where the Court declares that a regulation imposing anti-dumping duties is invalid. However, as recalled in paragraph 44 of the present judgment, the exact scope of a declaration of invalidity by the Court in a judgment and, consequently, of the obligations that flow from it must be determined in each specific case by taking into account not only the operative part of that judgment, but also the grounds that constitute its essential basis (judgment of 15 March 2018, Deichmann, C‑256/16, EU:C:2018:187, paragraphs 62 and 63).

Eurobolt BV and Others v European Commission and Stafa Group (C-517/22 P)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections