Judgment_paragraph 34 · KL and PO v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (C-508/22)

34In that regard, in the first place, it is settled case-law that the right to a refund of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of the rules of EU law is the consequence and complement of the rights conferred on individuals by provisions of EU law prohibiting such taxes, as interpreted by the Court. A Member State is, therefore, in principle required to repay charges levied in breach of EU law (see, in particular, judgments of 19 July 2012, Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others, C‑591/10, EU:C:2012:478, paragraph 24, and of 15 October 2014, Nicula, C‑331/13, EU:C:2014:2285, paragraph 27 and the case-law cited).

KL and PO v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Brașov (C-508/22)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version