Judgment_paragraph 104 · Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission (C-48/22 P)

104In the second place, the General Court cannot be criticised for having substituted, in paragraph 219 of the judgment under appeal, its own assessment for that set out in the decision at issue. The description of the conduct at issue, as set out by the General Court, is merely a way of describing the fact that Google was criticised for the more favourable positioning and display, in Google’s general search results pages, of its own comparison shopping service compared with competing comparison shopping services, which is stated several times in the decision at issue and in the judgment under appeal, with slight variations in the wording used.

Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission (C-48/22 P)

History · 1 version

Key facts

Connections